![invisible contracts by george mercier invisible contracts by george mercier](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/325752684_A_Pathogen_Astride_the_Minds_of_Men_The_Epidemiological_History_of_Pseudolaw/links/5f15c87792851c1eff21a2ff/largepreview.png)
Don't touch it, don't use it, don't answer to it, and don’t talk about it, just walk away from it. The answer lies in leaving the thing alone. If they would accept payment/consideration for it that you may have a higher standing in the thing than them, of which they will not (that I'm aware of), then how could you accept what is essentially a vessel/tool in commerce as your own and in doing the same not have it reflect a submission to being a party to commerce? I don't see how you could. and accepted or equity therein IT IS NOT YOURS! It's impractical to show equity therein because the whole purpose of the "vessel" is for commerce, so even if you could show so much as an implied interest in the thing, the act of doing so would only prove you were tied (contracted/covenanted) to commerce and put you back under the control of the creator thereof. You can file paper work until your blue in the face, but until you can show consideration given. It is because it is not yours, and without consideration given, and the same being never will be. I've seen a plethora of attempts and methods to reclaim this thing as ones own, all of which are faulty and proven to be the same by their eventual failure. The same has been created by Caesar, so the same adage applies "that which one creates, one controls". Now as for the vessel in commerce, straw man, all caps name, whatever you choose to call it. I know the 501 c 3 raised an eyebrow, and I'm not advocating the same.just merely pointing out that even they recognize God owns the land and they have no standing to excise a tax for the use thereof unless your actions warrant the same. is they still recognize this as a 501 c 3 doesn't pay "property (usage) taxes", nor is gold or silver taxed until you move it into commerce, and the same being true with animals. Now you have a right to land, gold, silver, minerals (pure), animals, and anything else created by the one whom created you. So if you choose to use it (it is a choice, most just don’t like the alternative), know that it comes with conditions of its usage by its creator, which is generally they want most of it back ".give unto Caesar, that which is Caesars". So we have no rights as a foreigner pertaining to the same, but merely the conditional uses thereof. We did not create the "money", fiat as it may be, and neither did our Lord.
![invisible contracts by george mercier invisible contracts by george mercier](https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/s-j-steven-j-hirsch-lucien-van-der-walt-anarchism-5.jpg)
But this is not what your foreign status confers upon you, the treasures and rewards you are given are in heaven and not worldly. As I perceive it, the problems arise when our brothers and sisters attempt to obtain worldly things and retain them because of their foreign standing. It is the will of our Father that is to be sought, am I right? As a bondservant (which we are if we confess to having a Lord just by the definition of the same) then our will is not our own, so how can we choose to be "sovereign"? I think more correctly is we are foreign to the World, ".to be in the world, but not of the world". Which creates another dilemma.is our will to be that of our own? I say surely not. If the maxim of law and nature stands that one controls that which one creates and one has given sovereignty to another.then has the giver not been also the creator of that sovereignty? and if so, then is the one who has been given sovereignty not still subject to the grantor thereof? Which is not sovereignty, but would be merely a vail or illusion thereof.right? Sovereignty can only be taken and secured to ones self by their own will. I believe it to be a condition of the thing its self. I have been studying this topic for a while (sovereign) and have came to the conclusion that at no point and time in history have I found evidence that it is, or can be, given or granted. Greetings, salutations, Peace, and blessings unto his ecclesia. Has anyone else on this forum decided to take this approach called status correction? have a ways to go but I feel this is s good step in declaring my true Citizenship one that only my Creator can grant. All,I presume were made under false pretenses. Am in the process of recinding and recoking all known contracts that i have made with the federal government over the span of thirty years. ECCLESIASTIC COMMONWEALTH COMMUNITY - Status Correction Please?